lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: no version magic, tainting kernel.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 10:29:50PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Judging on the number of people that got bid by the mach- include
> changes, I conclude that we better ask people to use kbuild.
>

Fair enough.

> The whole issues boils down to the following options:
> 1) The "kernel-headers" package shall be extended to include the
> vital part of kbuild
> 2) To develop modules you need the full kernel src
> 3) Do-it-yourself makefiles
>
> Can we agree on that - and take the discussion from there?
>
> In 1) and 2) you have total freedom to change options etc.
> Several architectures filter out generic options they dislike.
> Adding extra options is supported by kbuild (EXTRA_CFLAGS).
>
> In 3) you have all possibilities to screw up things. You would
> probarly argue you have full flexibility. But then I wonder what
> kind of flexibility you need for your module, that is not needed for
> all the modules included in the kernel? To take your argument and
> turn it around: What technical reasons are there to avoid kbuild?
>
> Please realise that you will be hit by changes in include paths,
> compiler options etc. That is visible in the number of mails seen
> on lkml the last couple of months.
>

The problem isn't necessarily lack of flexibility, but the lack of
unity across kernel versions. I agree that kbuild is the preferable
solution for Linux 2.5, but it isn't for all incarnations of Linux
2.4 and definetely not for Linux 2.2. I do realize that changes have
resulted in problems for external build systems and understand that
future changes may result in similar problems.

I guess a reasonable solution is adjusting existing Makefiles to be
smart enough to detect kbuild and use it when available.

--
christian zander
zander@minion.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.082 / U:7.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site