[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> (Davide), IMHO epoll should decide whether it means "at minimum" (in
> which case the +1 is a requirement), or it means "at maximum" (in
> which case rounding up is wrong).
> The current method of rounding up and then effectively down means that
> you get an unpredictable mixture of both.

I think I'll go with :

Tj = (Tms * HZ + 999) / 1000

Somehow I feel it more correct :)

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.069 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site