Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:49:56 -0800 (PST) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Linux in the News! WooHoo! |
| |
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 08:01:23 GMT, "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hps@intermeta.de> said: > > Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu writes: > > >It's open sourced. The rest is left as an exercise for the reader. > > <much very correct analysis by Henning elided> > > Enough exercising for you? > > Yes, I'm fully aware of the size of OpenOffice. So far I've had at least > a dozen people who apparently didn't pick up on the sarcasm without a smiley. > > Now to tie it back to another thread - the OpenOffice is just so honking HUGE > that a good case could be made that the source tarball is not the preferred > form for making modifications, because that sucker *has* to be in an IDE for > you to be able to find what it is you wanted to modify. ;)
Well last time I checked most things are stored in an IDE (disk); regardless of the tools. I could not let this one slip by.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |