Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:24:21 +0100 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? |
| |
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:
> As far as I can tell your complaint is that you can't have access to > the up to minute source view without using something which violates > your politics.
Not his politics. These no-competition clauses quickly extend to where you don't expect them, unintentionally.
> I guess I don't know how to help you. As far as I can tell, if Linus > wasn't using BK he'd still be doing what he was doing up until he started > using BK which means you wouldn't have the option of the up to date > snapshots you can currently get.
I'd translate it to the old "have a GP/BSD-licensed tool to just check out the stuff" (and leave modifications to some party that is entitled to the full BK version by whatever means, no competition + openlogging for instance or something). You mentioned CSSC in the past, but AFAIR, that's for local uncompressed repositories only. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |