Messages in this thread |  | | From | Andrew Theurer <> | Subject | Re: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7 | Date | Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:20:56 -0600 |
| |
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 10:17, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Michael, my experience has been that 2.5.59 loaded up the first node > > before distributing out tasks (at least on kernbench). > > Could you throw a printk in map_cpu_to_node and check which cpus come out > on which nodes? > > > I'll try to get some of these tests on x440 asap to compare. > > So what are you running on now? the HT stuff?
I am running nothing right now, mainly because I don't have access to that HT system anymore. HT-numa may work better than it did with the new load_balance idle policy, but I'm not sure it's worth persuing with Ingo's HT patch. Let me know if you think it's worth investigating.
-Andrew Theurer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |