lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7
Date
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 10:17, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > Michael, my experience has been that 2.5.59 loaded up the first node
> > before distributing out tasks (at least on kernbench).
>
> Could you throw a printk in map_cpu_to_node and check which cpus come out
> on which nodes?
>
> > I'll try to get some of these tests on x440 asap to compare.
>
> So what are you running on now? the HT stuff?

I am running nothing right now, mainly because I don't have access to that HT
system anymore. HT-numa may work better than it did with the new load_balance
idle policy, but I'm not sure it's worth persuing with Ingo's HT patch. Let
me know if you think it's worth investigating.

-Andrew Theurer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.092 / U:4.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site