[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Minor header bug? MIPS (32-bit) nlink_t sign
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > I assume we are being compatable with Irix? Ralf?
> Dunno where the signed int for nlink_t did come from. The original idea
> was to avoid pointless creativity and choose data types to match IRIX
> rsp. the MIPS psABI.

(I've been going through all the <asm-*/*.h> API files, and there is a
lot of duplication, with very small variations. It was with a view to
getting rid of some of the duplication, and making it easy to see what
the _real_ differences are).

MIPS and Sparc are the only architectures that decided to be really
different to all the other Linux archs).

Anyway, I spotted another MIPS suggestion:


The comments explain that siginfo_t is IRIX compatible with
extensions. In fact it is not IRIX compatible, now that
siginfo_t._sigchld has an additional _uid field in the middle
of it. So it's compatible for _some_ uses only.

It's obvious that the code author knew of this change (because
_irix_sigchld is there to document it), but didn't change the


That comment should be removed or changed as siginfo_t
is not IRIX compatible, at least in this part. And maybe
_irix_sigchld should be removed, along with the comment.

-- Jamie
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.056 / U:5.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site