[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: size in /proc/modules
In message <> you write:
> /proc/modules size field includes init_size in 2.5. Why ?
> The removal of sensible values in /proc/ksyms means that oprofile can no
> longer attribute module samples reliably. The only information we have
> is module_core address, and size == core_size+init_size. Since init code
> is removed in sys_init_module, this will overestimate, and can lead to
> overlapping with the start of another module, afaics.
> In 2.4, we had size(.text), which could underestimate (think
> .text.exit), but that is not a big problem.
> Rusty, does this fall under another one of your "corner cases" ? (what I
> would call "flaky code" ...)
> Or I have I just missed something obvious ?

Yes, line 1328 of kernel/module.c, by the sound of it 8)

I was thinking of you when I added this, actually.

Hope that helps!
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.040 / U:5.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site