[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: spinlock efficiency problem [was 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled)
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:58, Joe Korty wrote:
> The new, preemptable spin_lock() spins on an atomic bus-locking
> read/write instead of an ordinary read, as the original spin_lock
> implementation did. Perhaps that is the source of the inefficiency
> being seen.

Its a fairly critical "Never do this" on older intel processors and
kills the box very efficiently so your diagnosis is extremely

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.037 / U:2.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site