Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:59:39 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 |
| |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> I think we definitely need to tune this on a per-arch basis. There's no > way that one-size-fits-all is going to fit a situation as complex as > this (though we can definitely learn from each other's analysis).
agreed - although the tunable should be constant (if possible, or boot-established but not /proc exported), and there should be as few tunables as possible. We already tune some of our scheduler behavior to the SMP cachesize. (the cache_decay_ticks SMP logic.)
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |