Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:05:15 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? |
| |
Hi!
> > - Flaws in error recovery paths in certain situations > > - Lots of random oopses on boot/remove that were apparently > > introduced by the kobject/sysfs people and need chasing > > down. (There are some non sysfs ones mostly fixed) > > I guess the kobject/sysfs stuff could be ripped out if it doesn't > work - it is probably not a "must have" feature.
sysfs is needed to properly flush caches on powerdown and for S3/S4 suspend/resume to work. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |