[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 wrote:

> "or later" perhaps copyright could be defined, and headers added to
> derivative?

Luckily copyright holders cannot define the scope of copyright
law. This doesn't just include the (often illegal) EULAs of
proprietary software companies, but also the very strict
interpretation "some people" have of the GPL.

Both proprietary EULAs and the GPL have to work within the law
and cannot add anything illegal under the law.

Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:""></a>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.031 / U:1.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site