[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:39:39AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > What's the reason you can't just live with DAC for sysctls?
> >
> > What exactly do you mean by "live with DAC" in this context? If you mean
> > "allow UID==0 processes to do whatever they like" then it's not going to
> > work for any sort of chroot setup.
> This means check the unix file permissions / ACLs only overriden by
> CAP_FOWNER processes.

I don't think that would do for my chroot environments. I want to have root
owned processes running in a chroot with no ability to escape or to affect
the outside environment (and proc is mounted in the chroot).

-- My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark Postal SMTP/POP benchmark My home page

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.049 / U:0.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site