Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Jan 2003 05:15:28 +0000 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > > Thus far, the best solution I have for tracking checkins is to rsync > > the SCCS files from Rik's mirror, and use a Perl script to extract the > > head version from each SCCS file. > > Do you not use > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/
Oh, thanks. I didn't know about that.
> It always has the latest diff against the last-released kernel.
It is updated in real time then? (Assuming yes) that reduces the need to talk bk protocol quite a lot :)
(I'd still like to, though).
> I snarf it hourly, so I have decent granularity for doing the > binary-search-to-see-where-it-broke trick.
Good idea.
-- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |