Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:59:08 +0100 | From | Jakob Oestergaard <> | Subject | Re: argv0 revisited... |
| |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:46:38PM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <20030115191942.GD47@DervishD>, > DervishD <raul@pleyades.net> wrote: > >> > of init. Remember, is not any program, is an init. Should be a more > >> > clean way, I suppose :?? > >> I don't think is that big a deal ... if you startup the system normally, > >> sooner or later, /proc is going to be mounted. A [quickie] variation is: > > > > Yes, I know, and that's one option, but I would like to avoid the > >mounting. Not a big deal, anyway, as you say. The only thing is that > >it won't work in kernels without proc enabled (yes, there are people > >without 'proc', size issues, I suppose, etc...). > > I assume that init is passed on the kernel command line like > init=/what/ever, right ? > > Why not make that INIT=/what/ever, then make this /sbin/init:
Why not make a kernel patch that sets the INIT environment variable for the init process ?
-- ................................................................ : jakob@unthought.net : And I see the elder races, : :.........................: putrid forms of man : : Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, : : OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. : :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |