lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.58-mm1 with contest
Con Kolivas wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Contest (0.61pre) benchmark results for 2.5.58-mm1
>
>no_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 2 78 96.2 0 0.0 1.00
>2.5.56 3 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00
>2.5.57 3 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00
>2.5.58 2 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00
>2.5.58-mm1 4 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00
>cacherun:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 2 76 98.7 0 0.0 0.97
>2.5.56 3 76 100.0 0 0.0 0.96
>2.5.57 3 76 100.0 0 0.0 0.96
>2.5.58 2 76 100.0 0 0.0 0.96
>2.5.58-mm1 4 77 97.4 0 0.0 0.97
>process_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 2 94 79.8 30 17.0 1.21
>2.5.56 3 93 80.6 29 16.1 1.18
>2.5.57 3 93 81.7 28 16.1 1.18
>2.5.58 2 92 81.5 27 15.2 1.16
>2.5.58-mm1 3 94 80.9 29 16.0 1.19
>ctar_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 3 133 78.9 1 3.8 1.71
>2.5.56 3 152 75.7 1 4.6 1.92
>2.5.57 3 132 79.5 1 3.8 1.67
>2.5.58 3 117 82.1 1 6.0 1.48
>2.5.58-mm1 3 109 81.7 1 4.6 1.38
>xtar_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 3 113 79.6 1 6.2 1.45
>2.5.56 3 111 78.4 1 6.3 1.41
>2.5.57 3 107 80.4 1 5.6 1.35
>2.5.58 3 122 80.3 1 6.6 1.54
>2.5.58-mm1 3 121 76.0 1 6.6 1.53
>io_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 3 126 63.5 6 12.7 1.62
>2.5.56 3 131 59.5 7 13.0 1.66
>2.5.57 5 124 64.5 5 11.3 1.57
>2.5.58 3 153 54.9 8 14.3 1.94
>2.5.58-mm1 6 156 51.3 9 14.7 1.97
>read_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 3 95 82.1 9 5.3 1.22
>2.5.56 3 99 80.8 6 6.1 1.25
>2.5.57 3 100 80.0 6 7.0 1.27
>2.5.58 3 96 82.3 9 5.2 1.22
>2.5.58-mm1 4 96 83.3 176189 6.2 1.22
>
Something seems to have gone wrong with "Loads".

>
>list_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 3 91 84.6 0 8.8 1.17
>2.5.56 3 91 84.6 0 8.8 1.15
>2.5.57 3 91 84.6 0 8.8 1.15
>2.5.58 3 91 85.7 0 8.8 1.15
>2.5.58-mm1 2 92 83.7 0 9.8 1.16
>mem_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 3 116 73.3 66 1.7 1.49
>2.5.56 3 107 80.4 45 0.9 1.35
>2.5.57 3 110 80.0 47 0.9 1.39
>2.5.58 3 107 73.8 66 1.9 1.35
>2.5.58-mm1 3 104 75.0 50 1.0 1.32
>dbench_load:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2.5.55 3 117 68.4 2 16.2 1.50
>2.5.56 2 124 62.9 3 25.8 1.57
>2.5.57 3 121 64.5 3 22.3 1.53
>2.5.58 3 122 64.8 3 24.6 1.54
>2.5.58-mm1 3 118 66.9 3 22.0 1.49
>
>Only statistically significant diff b/w 2.5.58 and 2.5.58-mm1 is in ctar_load
>which is faster in mm1. Trend towards being faster in mem_load.
>
>Con
>
Looks good, thanks.

Nick

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.048 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site