lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
> Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of

Not easily, at least not without creating a circular dependency problem.
Try it ;-)

I guess we chould create another subarch header file just for these if we
really have to, but that seem like overkill.

If you can come up with a clean patch (check it compiles on uniproc with
and without IO/APIC turned on, and standard SMP as well), I'd really
be interested to see it ... would be most helpful

> replacing CONFIG NUMA by CONFIG NUMAQ?

Actually replacing CONFIG_X86_NUMA with CONFIG_NUMA ... and we could
do (CONFIG_NUMA || CONFIG_BIGSMP) instead. But you're right, subarch
would be much better if you can find a way.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.041 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site