lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
    Date
    From

    Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of
    replacing CONFIG NUMA by CONFIG NUMAQ?

    Thanks,
    -Venkatesh

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:mbligh@aracnet.com]
    > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:30 AM
    > To: Protasevich, Natalie
    > Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; 'William Lee Irwin III'; Nakajima,
    > Jun; 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'James Cleverdon'; 'Linux Kernel'
    > Subject: RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
    >
    >
    > > I ran into a couple places where CONFIG_X86_NUMA is still
    > there (replaced
    > > now with CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ), which disables following defines:
    >
    > Yeah, I saw those the other day. Should probably be replaced with
    > CONFIG_NUMA ... I'll tweak them once I get the last dribbles of Summit
    > pushed out to Linus.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > M.
    >
    >
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.022 / U:1.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site