lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
Date
From

Can these (MAX_IO_APICS, MAX_APICS) be moved to sub-arch too, instead of
replacing CONFIG NUMA by CONFIG NUMAQ?

Thanks,
-Venkatesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:mbligh@aracnet.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:30 AM
> To: Protasevich, Natalie
> Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; 'William Lee Irwin III'; Nakajima,
> Jun; 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'James Cleverdon'; 'Linux Kernel'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
>
>
> > I ran into a couple places where CONFIG_X86_NUMA is still
> there (replaced
> > now with CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ), which disables following defines:
>
> Yeah, I saw those the other day. Should probably be replaced with
> CONFIG_NUMA ... I'll tweak them once I get the last dribbles of Summit
> pushed out to Linus.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans