Messages in this thread |  | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 | Date | Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:28:02 +1100 |
| |
In message <200301132103.h0DL3R0p001528@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> you write: > [Massive snippage of Cc:] > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> > > [...] > > > This seems way overkill. How about you move the search_extable() > > prototype out of linux/module.h and into each asm/uaccess.h, then: > > > > include/asm-m68knommu/uaccess.h: > > > > /* We don't use such things. */ > > struct exception_table_entry > > { > > int unused; > > }; > > Why not just an empty structure?
Ancient compilers. See linux/spinlock.h. Since it's not actually used, putting in a #ifdef is overkill...
Hope that helps! Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |