[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Changing argv[0] under Linux.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Mark Mielke wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:56:35PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > Well I just grepped through usr/include/bits/posix1_lim.h and it
> > shows 255 (with this 'C' library) so you are probably right.
> > In any event, a "whole line of text" isn't going to overrun it.
> Looking at the code, it looks to me as if argv[0] can be any size up to
> _SC_ARG_MAX, with the restraining factor being that the environment
> variables and the other arguments must fit in the same space.
> Is this not correct?
> mark

Don't think so. In my headers _SC_ARG_MAX is an enumerated type
that is numerically equal to 0. It's in confname.h, the first
element in the enumerated list.

Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.070 / U:2.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site