[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 08:43, Erich Focht wrote:
> Aargh, I should have gone home earlier...
> For those who really care about patch 05, it's attached. It's all
> untested as I don't have a ia32 NUMA machine running 2.5.58...

One more minor problem - the first two patches are missing the
following defines, and result in compile issues:


Looking through previous patches, and the 05 patch, I found
these defines and put them under the #if CONFIG_NUMA in sched.c
that defines node_nr_running and friends.

With these three lines added, I have a kernel built and booted
using the first numa-sched and numa-sched-add patches.

Test results will follow later in the day.


> Erich
> On Tuesday 14 January 2003 17:23, Erich Focht wrote:
> > In the previous email the patch 02-initial-lb-2.5.58.patch had a bug
> > and this was present in the numa-sched-2.5.58.patch and
> > numa-sched-add-2.5.58.patch, too. Please use the patches attached to
> > this email! Sorry for the silly mistake...
> >
> > Christoph, I used your way of coding nr_running_inc/dec now.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Erich


Michael Hohnbaum 503-578-5486 T/L 775-5486

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.107 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site