lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

Matti Aarnio writes:

> Advanced optimizer hinting features, like unlikely() attribute
> are very new in (this) compiler, and while they in theory move the
> "unlikely" codes out of the fast-path, such things have been buggy
> in the past, and we are worried of bug effects...

I've been wondering about this as the goto-thread spewed by.

As I recall, gcc recently started moving basic blocks around.
This destroyed most of the careful goto-based optimizations.
Now we're supposed to use likely() and unlikely() instead.

Hmmm?

BTW, what I'd like is a way to change optimization settings
on a per-function or even per-block basis. Telling gcc to
unroll a specific loop or pack a function into a tiny space
would be really cool. __attribute__((__opt__("-Os")))
I could go for an "assume default case can't happen" too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.025 / U:1.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site