lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:14:52AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:

> >But still requiring up-apic, or smp with apic, right?
>
> nmi_watchdog=2 - uses performance counters, not apic.

which requires a local APIC to set up NMI delivery mode like Jens said

regards
john

--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
the thread is over.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.119 / U:5.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site