[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: some curiosities on the filesystems layout in kernel config
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:00:40 EST, "Robert P. J. Day" <>  said:

> 2) shouldn't ext3 depend on ext2?

No, because somebody might want ext3 only, and have no intention or
desire to mount a filesystem in ext2 mode. Everything on this laptop
is ext3...

> 3) currently, since quotas are only supported for ext2, ext3 and
> reiserfs, shouldn't quotas depend on at least one of those
> being selected?

Because if we did that, we'd be setting ourselves up for a mess when
fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c eventually shows up - like it already has ;)

Also, from my (possibly incorrect) reading of kernel/sys.c and
fs/quota.c, there won't be a sys_quotactl() in the kernel. As a
result, if you have users who have 'quota -v' in their .login, things
might get interesting. So you might want a config where the quota
system call is there, even if it doesn't do anything incredibly

Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.071 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site