Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:19:28 -0500 | From | Rob Wilkens <> | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? |
| |
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 20:51, Nuno Monteiro wrote: > You dont realistically expect to learn how to program reading > Documentation/CodingStyle, do you? CodingStyle merely serves as general
No, but I would expect rules of kernel coding to be in there. For example, we were talking about using return mid-function. I always considerred that perfectly OK. Others were saying that's a no-no. If it's a no-no, it should be documented. That is, if it's a no-no. That may be a situational thing though.
> See things from this end -- when 99% of the people tell you you're wrong, > consider the possibility you are _actually_ wrong, and not the other way > around.
99% of the people are running a microsoft based OS (It has 95% of the market in terms of sales, but factor in pirated copies and your figure will get close), of the 0.5% running linux, 0.025% of them are probably subscribed to this mailing list. Of that, probably 5% read it regularly. Now, of those 5% (of 0.25% of 0.5%), I'm probably getting 5-10 people reacting negatively (the rest are neutral reactions or no reactions), and claiming to speak (in a rather -- shall we say -- arrogant and self-important manor) for the list as a whole.
> Now, off to ~/.killfile you go.
Yeah, yeah, should've done it before..
-Rob
p.s. Yes, all statistics are made up on the spot for comical purposes only and are only half-way intended to represent the real world. p.p.s. given those percentages, 5-10 people may be a lot percentagewise, I don't know, I haven't done the math.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |