[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:06, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Please don't do such things. The next time locking is changed and a lock
> is needed here, some poor guy has to go through that and change all
> back to goto.
> This may not be applicable here, but as a general rule, don't do it.
> I speak from experience.
> As for efficiency, that is the compiler's job.

I say "please don't use goto" and instead have a "cleanup_lock" function
and add that before all the return statements.. It should not be a
burden. Yes, it's asking the developer to work a little harder, but the
end result is better code.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.200 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site