[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
Alan Cox wrote:
>> I've looked into this, and wow, it's not a simple
fix :(
>> But this is really the first it's been mentioned, I
can't see holding up
>> 2.6 for this. It's a 2.7 job at the earliest,
unless someone wants to
>> step up and do it right now...
>2.5.x crashes erratically and randomly under high
tty/pty load. At the
>moment I'm assuming this is the tty code. That means
we can't decide not
>to fix it since its already fatally broken.

Is there a list of things broken and "homeless"? I
have seen a number of
people say (and do) fix things when they are
specificaly pointed out as
being broken. if a list doesn't exist, could linus or
alan post one
somewhere? like the LKML maintainers list backwards.

just a thought

David Truog

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.027 / U:0.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site