[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 12:27, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Can you quickly summarize what is broken with IDE ?
> Are just some low level drivers broken or are there some generic
> nasty problems.
> If it is just some broken low level drivers I guess they can
> be marked dangerous or CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.

Low level drivers are basically sorted.

The main problems are
- Incorrect locking all over the place
- Incorrect timings on some phases
- Some ioctls can cause crashes due to locking
- ISAPnP IDE doesn't work right now
- Flaws in error recovery paths in certain situations
- Lots of random oopses on boot/remove that were apparently
introduced by the kobject/sysfs people and need chasing
down. (There are some non sysfs ones mostly fixed)
- ide-scsi needs some cleanup to fix switchover ide-cd/scsi
(We can't dump ide-scsi)
- Unregister path has races which cause all the long
standing problems with pcmcia and prevents pci unreg
- PCI IDE driver registration needs busy checks
- PCI layer needs some stuff from 2.4
- PCI layer in 2.4/2.5 needs an IRQ bug fixing
- ACPI doesn't seem to handle compatibility IRQ mode
- We don't handle a few errata (MWDMA on 450NX for example)
- IDE raid hasn't been ported to 2.5 at all yet

Thats off the top of my head right now.

> How does it differ from the code that was just merged into 2.4.21pre3
> (has the later all the problems fixed?)

No, although some don't show up in the same ways in 2.4 - eg the pcmcia
unload race is rare in 2.4 for other reasons. Endianism should all
be cured in 2.4, and I sent that to Linus. The PCI i/o assignment code
in 2.4 is done. I hope to have some of the locking and also the timing
path work Ross Biro has done in for 2.4.22 proper

> > broken and nobody has even started fixing it. Just try a mass of parallel
> > tty/pty activity . It was problematic before, pre-empt has taken it to dead,
> > defunct and buried.
> Can someone shortly describe what is the main problem with TTY?
> >From what I can see the high level tty code mostly takes lock_kernel
> before doing anything.

Which works really well with all the IRQ paths on it

> On reads access to file->private_data is not serialized, but it at
> least shouldn't go away because VFS takes care of struct file
> reference counting.

The refcounting bugs are/were in the ldisc stuff. I thought the
bluetooth folks (Max and co) fixed that one

If we can lock_kernel the tty layer for now (I'm bothered about
the ldisc end of tht which is IRQ context) then great, tty scaling
is suddenelly a 2.7 problem.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.061 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site