Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH]Re: spin_locks without smp. | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 11 Jan 2003 14:29:32 +0000 |
| |
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 13:22, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > On 10 Jan 2003 18:18:39 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > >On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 17:19, Manfred Spraul wrote: > >> > >> disable_irq(); > >> spin_lock(&np->lock); > >> > >> That's what 8390.c uses, no need for an #ifdef. > > > >Does someone have a card they can test that on. If so then I agree > >entirely it is the best way to go > > I have an ISA NE2000 available for testing, if someone feeds me patches. > Only UP hardware, though.
Sorry I wasnt clear enough. The 8390 is done, the one that would need the testing is SMP etherexpress.c.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |