lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH]Re: spin_locks without smp.
From
Date
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 13:22, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2003 18:18:39 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> >On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 17:19, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >>
> >> disable_irq();
> >> spin_lock(&np->lock);
> >>
> >> That's what 8390.c uses, no need for an #ifdef.
> >
> >Does someone have a card they can test that on. If so then I agree
> >entirely it is the best way to go
>
> I have an ISA NE2000 available for testing, if someone feeds me patches.
> Only UP hardware, though.

Sorry I wasnt clear enough. The 8390 is done, the one that would need the
testing is SMP etherexpress.c.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.041 / U:4.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site