[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: detecting hyperthreading in linux 2.4.19
Pallipadi, Venkatesh writes:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mikael Pettersson []
> >
> > My performance monitoring counters driver uses this approach
> > in kernel-space
> > using smp_call_function(). I don't use the siblings tables
> > because they suck :-)
> > [I don't think they distinguish between logical CPUs #0 and
> > #1, and they aren't
> > exported to modules. The CPUID check is simple and portable
> > across kernel versions.]
> I believe it is better to use a OS interface to find out HT, rather than
> using CPUID. The reason being, it is possible to have HT disabled, in OS,
> even after processor and the BIOS supports it.
> 1) Consider the case when processor and BIOS supports HT, but linux
> was booted with "noht" boot option (now I am not sure whether that option is
> there in 2.4.19. But is is certainly there in some other kernels).
> 2) What about some other kernel which is totally ignorant about HT, and
> doesn't initialize logical processor (kernel which looks at MPS in place
> of ACPI)
> I think, in both these cases cpuid can still say HT is present.

With smp_call_function() I execute code on exactly those CPUs the kernel
knows about. If the physical processors support HT but the kernel can't
run on the non-#0 logical CPUs (UP kernel or "noht"), then smp_call_function()
won't reach those logical CPUs #1 and everything's fine: my test will say
"not HT" which is exactly what I want in this case.

The point about checking the "local APIC physical ID" in CPUID 1, EBX,
instead of the field in the local APIC is _exactly_ because the CPUID
data is assigned by HW and read-only, while the local APIC field can be
changed. I don't want to depend on possibly-broken MP or ACPI tables or
have to know about the kernel's physical <--> virtual CPU # mapping de jour.

> I know that sibling table is not exported. But I couldn't get your other
> comment about sibling table "they distinguish between logical CPUs #0 and #1:"
> Can you elaborate..

The sibling table tells you whether two linux-numbered CPUs are siblings,
but it doesn't tell which one is logical CPU #0 and which one is #1.
That distinction is important in some cases.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.037 / U:1.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site