Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 10 Jan 2003 05:11:00 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: small migration thread fix |
| |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote: > the small patch fixes a potential problem in the migration thread for > the case that the first CPU in the cpus_allowed mask of a process is > offline. Please consider applying it to your trees.
I'm not mingo, but I can say this looks sane. My only question is whether there are more codepaths that need this kind of check, for instance, what happens if someone does set_cpus_allowed() to a cpumask with !(task->cpumask & cpu_online_map) ?
Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |