lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Impact of scheduler tunables on interactive response (was Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio)
Date
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 10:05 am, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> This sounds very like my resp2 (www.unyuug.org/benchmarks/) program
> I announced on this list some months ago, but resp2 generates loads
> of a specific type so that you can determine of changes affect i/o
> load, swapping load, CPU load, etc

Have you (or anyone else) used resp2 to measure the impact of the
scheduler tunables on interactive responsiveness yet, and if so, what
are your conclusions?

Also, your benchmark page doesn't list a URL for resp2. Sure, I could
Google for one, but wouldn't it be nice to update your page, too?
---scott


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.094 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site