Messages in this thread |  | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | | Subject | Re: LMbench2.0 results | | Date | Sun, 8 Sep 2002 22:02:04 +0200 |
| |
On Saturday 07 September 2002 18:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I've just ran lmbench2.0 on my laptop. > > Here the results (again, 2.5.33 seems to be "slow", I don't know why...) > > > > The fork/exec/mmap slowdown is the rmap overhead. I have some stuff > which partialy improves it.
It only seems like a big deal if you get out your microscope and focus on the fork times. On the other hand, look at the sh times: the rmap setup time gets lost in the noise. The latter looks more like reality to me.
I suspect the overall performance loss on the laptop has more to do with several months of focussing exclusively on the needs of 4-way and higher smp machines.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |