Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:09:24 +0200 (CEST) | From | venom@sns ... | Subject | Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 |
| |
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:28:50 +0000 > From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> > To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org> > Cc: venom@sns.it, ahu@ds9a.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 > > Hi! > > > > I usually run byte bench regularly with every new kernel, so I see some > > > strange results here. > > > > > > From your numbers, I would say you are using a PIII 600/900 Mhz (more or > > > less). It is not an AMD AThlon or a PIV, since float and double are too > > > slow, not it is a K6 because they are too fast. > > Yes, I ran the test on a HP Omnibook 600 (PIII@900) > > APM or ACPI? How did you guarantee not going powersave? > I suppose Paolo disabled power saving both from bios and from kernel, of course. If not, then the differences I noticed could be explained easilly, Thanx
Luigi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |