Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:01:01 -0700 | | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | | Subject | Re: LMbench2.0 results |
| |
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 09:20:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> The fork/exec/mmap slowdown is the rmap overhead. I have some stuff >>> which partialy improves it.
William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Hmm, Where does it enter the mmap() path? PTE instantiation is only done >> for the VM_LOCKED case IIRC. Otherwise it should be invisible.
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 04:12:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Oh, is that just the mmap() call itself?
I'm not actually sure what lmbench is doing.
William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Perhaps testing with overcommit on would be useful.
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 04:12:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Well yes - the new overcommit code was a significant hit on the 16ways > was it not? You have some numbers on that?
I don't remember the before/after numbers, but I can collect some.
Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |