Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 07 Sep 2002 02:05:12 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: ext3 throughput woes on certain (possibly heavily fragmented) files |
| |
Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:22:22PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>I think I prefer that we implement a repacker for reiser4 though, as >>that, combined with delayed allocation, will be a balanced and thorough >>solution. >> >> > >How does current ReiserFS fare against extreme fragmentation? What >about XFS? Without trying to risk a flamewar, what Linux filesystems >are the most preventive of fragmentation? > >The filesystem could make a huge difference on a machine like a mail >server... > > > > Sometimes it is best to confess that one does not have the expertise appropriate for answering a question. Someone on our mailing list studied it carefully though. Perhaps they can comment.
Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |