lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
Date
In message <20020906.113448.07697441.davem@redhat.com>, > : "David S. Miller" w
rites:
> From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:19:11 -0700
>
> TUX can optimize dynamic content just fine.
>
> The last I knew was that it could pass it off to another server.

Out of curiosity, and primarily for my own edification, what kind
of optimization does it do when everything is generated by a java/
perl/python/homebrew script and pasted together by something which
consults a content manager. In a few of the cases that I know of,
there isn't really any static content to cache... And why is this
something that Apache couldn't/shouldn't be doing?

gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.146 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site