[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [reiserfs-dev] Re: [PATCH] sparc32: wrong type of nlink_t
>    From: Tomas Szepe <>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:40:08 +0200
> > Our disk format has link counts > 32k
> Does the internal reiserfs nlink value translate directly
> to what stat() puts in st_nlink?
> It really doesn't matter. Even if you have some huge value that can't
> be represented in st_nlink, you can report to the user that st_nlink
> This is one possible solution to this whole problem.

And a pretty straightforward one, too. Convert the internal reiserfs
link stuff to an unsigned short, find NLINK_MAX using the code I posted
last night (or maybe simply grab it from userspace includes) and add
a check to your stat() code to return NLINK_MAX if necessary.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.088 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site