[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [reiserfs-dev] Re: [PATCH] sparc32: wrong type of nlink_t
       From: Tomas Szepe <>
    Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:40:08 +0200

    > Our disk format has link counts > 32k

    Does the internal reiserfs nlink value translate directly
    to what stat() puts in st_nlink?

    It really doesn't matter. Even if you have some huge value that can't
    be represented in st_nlink, you can report to the user that st_nlink
    is NLINK_MAX.

    This is one possible solution to this whole problem.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.024 / U:1.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site