[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3
>>>>> " " == Andrew Morton <> writes:

> It's a bit worrisome if NFS is dependent upon successful
> pagecache takedown in invalidate_inode_pages.

Why? We don't use all that buffer crap, so in principle
invalidate_inode_page() is only supposed to fail for us if

- page is locked (i.e. new read in progress or something like that)
- page is refcounted (by something like mmap()).

neither of which should be the case here.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.068 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site