Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Sep 2002 22:27:04 +0200 | Subject | Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3 | From | Trond Myklebust <> |
| |
>>>>> " " == Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> writes:
> It's a bit worrisome if NFS is dependent upon successful > pagecache takedown in invalidate_inode_pages.
Why? We don't use all that buffer crap, so in principle invalidate_inode_page() is only supposed to fail for us if
- page is locked (i.e. new read in progress or something like that) - page is refcounted (by something like mmap()).
neither of which should be the case here.
Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |