Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:02:40 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.20pre5aa1 |
| |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:59:17PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > I think we should take the XFS-specific inode lock around vmtruncate. > > Need to double-check with Steve. > > this is the function I'm looking at and it's called with xfs specific > inode lock, and I don't see it grabbed either before calling vmtruncate:
should != do
we either need to use your accessors for i_size or take the XFS inode lock around vmtruncate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |