[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3
Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > That all assumes SMP/preempt. If you're seeing these problems on
> > uniproc/non-preempt then something fishy may be happening.
> sorry, forgot to mention: the system is UP, non-preemptible, high mem.
> invalidate_inode_pages isn't freeing these pages because the page count is
> two. perhaps the page count semantics of one of the page cache helper
> functions has changed slightly. i'm still diagnosing.

OK, thanks. I can't immediately think of anything which would have
altered the refcounting in there except for page reclaim.

What you could do is to check whether the `page_count(page) != 1'
pages are on the LRU. If they have !PageLRU(page) then the extra
ref was taken by shrink_cache(). But that would be pretty rare,
especially on UP.

You may have more success using the stronger invalidate_inode_pages2().
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.109 / U:1.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site