Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:19:55 +0200 | From | Harald Welte <> | Subject | Re: ip_conntrack_hash() problem |
| |
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I think the hash function should be fixed, not the possible choice of > > hash sizes, if that is at feasible. > I also agree with Martin that it is better to fix the hash function in > this case. Restricting to magic hash table sizes looks like a bad hack.
I wasn't proposing to restrict it. Just make it chose a sane default.
> -Andi
-- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M- V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |