lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: ip_conntrack_hash() problem
    On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > I think the hash function should be fixed, not the possible choice of
    > > hash sizes, if that is at feasible.
    > I also agree with Martin that it is better to fix the hash function in
    > this case. Restricting to magic hash table sizes looks like a bad hack.

    I wasn't proposing to restrict it. Just make it chose a sane default.

    > -Andi

    --
    Live long and prosper
    - Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org http://www.gnumonks.org/
    ============================================================================
    GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M-
    V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:4.148 / U:0.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site