[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ip_conntrack_hash() problem
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I think the hash function should be fixed, not the possible choice of
> > hash sizes, if that is at feasible.
> I also agree with Martin that it is better to fix the hash function in
> this case. Restricting to magic hash table sizes looks like a bad hack.

I wasn't proposing to restrict it. Just make it chose a sane default.

> -Andi

Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte /
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M-
V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.079 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site