[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [reiserfs-dev] Re: [PATCH] sparc32: wrong type of nlink_t
    David S. Miller wrote:

    > From: Hans Reiser <>
    > Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:31:36 +0400
    > The proper fix should be to make the result of the limit
    > computation be accurately architecture specific.
    >And then each and every Reiserfs partition is platform specific
    >and cannot be mounted onto another Linux platform.
    >Creating such a restriction is a grave error.
    And you would cripple the 99% usage to aid those users who move disk
    drives physically over to a sparc box AND have more than 31k links to a

    Or is there some usage pattern that I don't appreciate that makes it
    highly likely that people will swap disks into a sparc? Maybe these hot
    plug ruggedized with plastic covers IDE disks that there was some press
    about being a substitute for DVDs a few months ago?

    Frankly, I had doubts about our code that causes CPU order to not be
    used in the disk format, but I was persuaded that it was not a
    measurable performance loss to do it and said yes.

    I recognize that you may see things from a perspective that I have not
    experienced, so please articulate on that if so.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.046 / U:2.264 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site