[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: TCP Segmentation Offloading (TSO)
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On 3 Sep 2002, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> [Sorry HPA, I forgot to cc to linux-kernel the first time.]
>>> Using "bswap" is little bit tricky.
>>It needs to be protected by CONFIG_I486 and alternate code implemented
>>for i386 (xchg %al,%ah; rol $16,%eax, xchg %al,%ah for example.)
> While it would work, this sequence is overkill. Unless I'm mistaken, the
> only property of bswap which is used in this case is that it swaps even
> and odd bytes, which can be done by a simple "roll $8,%eax" (or rorl).
> I believe that bswap is one byte shorter than roll. In any case, using a
> rotate might be the right thing to do on other architectures.

And again, I think you'll find the rotate faster on at least some x86 cores.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.068 / U:2.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site