lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: consequences of lowering "MAX_LOW_MEM"?
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> >I think you'll find yourself with no virtual address space left to
> >do vmalloc / fixmap / kmap type stuff. Or at least you would on i386,
> >I presume it's the same for ppc. Sounds like you may have left
> >yourself enough space for fixmap & kmap, but any calls to vmalloc
> >will probably fail ?
>
> Yes, same problem on PPC, you'll run out of virtual space quite
> quickly for vmalloc and ioremap. Stuff a video board with lots
> of VRAM or any PCI card exposing large MMIO regions into your
> machines and it will probably not even boot.
>
> Ben.
>

Ben,
But doesn't using Matt's suggestion and moving both MAX_LOW_MEM and
changing KERNELBASE take care of this? It's an embedded board with no
video, but it does have one PCI Mezzanine Card (PMC) on it.

Thanks.

--
Craig.
+------------------------------------------------------+
http://www.wombat.ca/rpmon.html RP Music Monitor
http://www.washington.edu/pine/ Pine @ the U of Wash.
+-------------=*sent via Pine4.44*=--------------------+





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.091 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site