[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Important per-cpu fix.

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> Oh, "I'm" willing to upgrade "my" compiler, it's my users that are the
> problem. If you impose 3.1 or whatever, I get less people testing on
> sparc64 as a result.

Oh, well. I couldn't use gcc 3.* on sparc64 for some weird reason, gcc
2.95* is unable to handle all that crap, and the egcs hackup can't handle
the current kernel code. So what?

--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.108 / U:1.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site