[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: v2.6 vs v3.0
    On Monday 30 September 2002 02:05, Michael Clark wrote:
    > On 09/30/02 05:46, Matthias Andree wrote:
    > >
    > > Is not EVMS ready for the show? Is Linux >=2.6 going to have LVM2 and
    > > EVMS? Or just LVM2? I'm not aware of the current status, but I do recall
    > > having seen EVMS stable announcements (but not sure about 2.5 status).
    > From reading the EVMS list, it was working with 2.5.36 a couple weeks
    > ago but needs some small bio and gendisk changes to work in 2.5.39.
    > CVS version may be up-to-date quite soon from reading the thread.
    > It seems to be further along in 2.5 support than LVM2 - also including
    > the fact that EVMS supports LVM1 metadata (which the 2.5 version of LVM2
    > may not do so quite so soon from mentions on the lvm list).
    > I haven't tried EVMS but certainly from looking at the feature set,
    > it looks more comprehensive and modular than LVM (with its support
    > for multiple metadata personalities).
    > I too have LVM on quite a few of my machines, including my desktop,
    > and if I wanted to test 2.5 right now - i'd probably have to do it
    > using EVMS.

    EVMS is now up-to-date and running on 2.5.39. You can get the latest kernel
    code from CVS ( or Bitkeepr
    ( There will be a new, full release (1.2) coming out
    this week.

    Kevin Corry
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.022 / U:72.948 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site