Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:15:37 +0530 | From | Dipankar Sarma <> | Subject | Re: [patch] generic work queue handling, workqueue-2.5.39-D6 |
| |
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:58:25PM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > it cannot get any simpler than this. Work-queues are SMP-safe and > guarantee serialization of actual work performed. >
Ingo,
Is it possible that queue_task() handlers in earlier driver code may have depended on implicit serialization against corresponding timer handlers since each of those is run from BHs ? If so, isn't that an issue now with no BHs ? Or, is it safe to assume that general smp-safety code in the drivers will take care of serialization between timers and work-queues ?
Thanks -- Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |