lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection.
Date
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 02:41, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209031610200.10759-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> you
> write:
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. struct list
> > > 2. struct list_node
> > >
> > > With these two types, `list_add' et al. can actually _check_ that you
> > > got the arguments the right way around.
> >
> > Well, the thing is, one of the _advantages_ of "struct list_head" is
> > exactly the fact that the implementation is 100% agnostic about whether a
> > list entry is the head, or just part of the list.
>
> Excellent. Well I'm glad that's sorted.
>
> Now please apply my patch (which got sidelined by nomenclature fetishers),

Yep, half a frog in the blender is better than no frog.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.080 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site