Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9 | Date | Tue, 3 Sep 2002 22:19:29 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 22:04, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:02:38PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > If you must have a clever macro: > > > > #define lli(foo) (long long int) (foo) > > #define llu(foo) (long long unsigned) (foo) > > > > The %lli/%llu have to be there in the format string (modulo as-yet-uninvented > > printk hackery) so the cast might as well be there as well. > > Do you not read the messages in a thread before posting? > > static inline long long llsect(sector_t sect) { return sect; } > > was the suggestion.
I didn't like it, I thought it was awkward. This is better:
printk("%lli ", llu(sect));
and
printk("%lli ", (long long unsigned) sect);
is probably better yet. Why get fancy.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |